Skip to main content
← All articles
test kitsdrug checkingreagent testingdancesafeharm reduction

DanceSafe vs Bunk Police: An Honest Comparison

How DanceSafe and Bunk Police reagent kits actually differ on reagent range, kit contents, shipping and test strips, with our affiliate conflict disclosed.

August 15, 2026 · Jordan Mercer

Not medical advice. Harm reduction information for people who have already decided to use. In an emergency, call your local emergency number. Some links are affiliate links; we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Contents

No published, independent head-to-head test shows that one company’s reagents are more accurate than the other’s. Both sell formulations that have been in use for decades, neither publishes third-party validation of its own product, and anyone claiming one brand “reads truer” is offering an opinion. What actually separates them is reagent range, what comes in the box, where they ship, and where the money goes.

Disclosure first: Rave Wellness earns an affiliate commission when you buy through our DanceSafe links, and earns nothing from Bunk Police. We have a financial reason to prefer one of these companies, and you should weigh what follows with that in mind. We wrote it so a Bunk Police customer would read it and find it accurate. Where Bunk Police is the better choice, we say so.

What each one is

DanceSafe is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, EIN 94-3365608, founded in 1998. Its about page states that it produces reagents in-house in northern California, that it is the only nonprofit drug checking kit manufacturer in America, and that it provides free on-site drug checking at events with producer consent.

Bunk Police is a private operation founded under the pseudonym Adam Auctor, by someone who started out testing for free at North American festivals. It does not describe itself as a nonprofit and is generally understood to be for-profit. Its stated mission is reducing overdose deaths through transparency about the supply.

Buying from the nonprofit that also runs free drug checking is a legitimate reason to pick DanceSafe. What nonprofit status does not tell you is anything about chemistry. A 501(c)(3) letter is a tax classification, not a quality certification, and we are not going to argue otherwise.

Reagent range: nine each, but not the same nine

Both list nine reagents. Eight overlap.

ReagentDanceSafeBunk Police
Marquis, Mecke, Mandelin, Simon’sYesYes
Froehde, Liebermann, Ehrlich, MorrisYesYes
FolinYesNo
HofmannNoYes

That is the entire difference in range, and it cuts both ways. Hofmann, a secondary indole reagent some people run alongside Ehrlich on blotter, is Bunk Police only. Folin, used to flag piperazines, is DanceSafe only. Neither gap is a knock on either company, but it settles the purchase outright for anyone who needs a specific bottle.

Both now use Morris as the ketamine reagent rather than Mandelin, matching current practice. Our reagent color chart hub covers how to read each of these, whoever made the bottle.

What is in a comparable kit

Take the most common purchase, an MDMA kit.

  • DanceSafe MDMA kit: Marquis, Simon’s A, Simon’s B and Froehde. No Mecke. It ships with one fentanyl test strip and a 10 mg micro scoop.
  • Bunk Police MDMA Spot Kit Package: Marquis, Simon’s and Mecke, per their own how to test MDMA page, which states plainly that fentanyl strips are sold separately.

Both do the essential job the same way: Marquis to screen, Simon’s to separate MDMA from MDA. The third reagent differs, Froehde against Mecke, and neither choice is wrong. Bunk Police also suggests Mandelin for PMA and PMMA. Our MDMA testing walkthrough explains what each reagent does.

Both sell fentanyl, xylazine and nitazene strips, so coverage is level there. DanceSafe bundles a strip into its cocaine, LSD and ketamine kits and sells strips in bulk boxes with printed instruction sheets, aimed at chapters and community distributors; Bunk Police keeps strips separate across the board. Whichever you buy, the strip reads the same way and it is counterintuitive: one line means POSITIVE, two lines mean NEGATIVE. The common failures are dilution and read-time errors, not brand errors, and our fentanyl strip guide covers both.

Shipping

We checked both shipping pages directly. Both ship from the US, and both publish the same list of 17 countries they cannot reach: Brazil, China, Colombia, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United Arab Emirates and Vietnam. Both put customs duties on the customer, both warn that undelivered international USPS orders are not refundable, both ship in plain brown boxes with a discreet return address, and neither accepts returns.

Bunk Police’s homepage claims successful shipment to over 100 countries, and DanceSafe makes no comparable claim. That is marketing rather than a verified figure, and with identical exclusion lists we would not read it as broader reach. Outside the US, check your own customs rules and look for a regional supplier first.

What Bunk Police has that DanceSafe does not

On reference material Bunk Police is genuinely stronger, and this is its clearest advantage. Its site hosts a free colour guide booklet for each of its nine reagents, a public reaction video library presented as companion material to its book Chromatic Reactions: The Art of Testing Drugs, and a harm reduction app; printed booklets ship with the kits. DanceSafe supplies instructions and colour charts but has no equivalent video library.

It also runs product lines DanceSafe does not compete in at all. Skylab separation kits are silica cards, developing liquid and a black light, a home version of thin-layer chromatography meant to separate a mixed sample before you test the parts, which reagents cannot do because a strong reaction masks a weaker one. QTest purity kits estimate how much of a substance is present once identity is confirmed, since spot tests give identity and not quantity. And their Transparency Testing mail-in service accepts powders, pills, crystals, blotters and liquids, listing FTIR, LC-MS, NMR and NIR as methods.

Nobody has independently verified how well Skylab or QTest perform, us included. Treat them as products addressing real gaps, not as validated instruments.

Is there published evidence either is better?

No. Reagent chemistry is not proprietary, both sell long-established formulations, and we found no independent head-to-head comparison of the two.

The failure modes are identical whoever sold you the bottle. Reagents do not give dose or purity, a dominant substance masks a minor one, and nothing in a reagent bottle detects fentanyl. Heat and age degrade them, and Bunk Police’s own FAQ advises against using a kit over a year old, which is sound guidance for either brand. See our post on whether reagent kits expire.

Which should you buy

Pick by situation, not by verdict.

  • You want your money going to a nonprofit: DanceSafe. The structure and the free event drug checking are real, and this is the one axis where the difference is unambiguous. Start with its kits.
  • You want the widest toolset, video references or a lab option: Bunk Police. Nothing at DanceSafe competes with the separation kits, purity kits, video library or mail-in lab.
  • You need one specific reagent: Hofmann means Bunk Police, Folin means DanceSafe. Nothing else to weigh.
  • Outside the US: close to a coin flip, and a regional supplier may beat both.
  • Buying strips in volume for a program: DanceSafe’s bulk boxes and printed instruction sheets are built for it.
  • New, and you just want to test your pills: either works. Buy the kit matching the substance you use, add fentanyl strips, and read the instructions the day before rather than at 1am. Our which test kit guide walks through it.

The dishonest version of this post concludes that the company paying us wins everywhere. It does not. DanceSafe wins on where the money goes; Bunk Police wins on breadth of product and reference material. On the question most people actually have, whether the chemicals are better, there is no evidence either way, and we would rather say that than invent a difference.